Yatırımcı.AI

FSR vs YVG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSR (Fiba Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and YVG (Yapı Kredi Portföy Sarıyer Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

FSRYVG
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FSR vs YVG Fund Comparison
MetricFSRYVGCategory median
Daily0.19%0.19%0.19%
1 week−0.32%−0.32%0.42%
1 month−0.43%−0.44%0.94%
3 months5.72%5.75%5.89%
6 months9.97%10.35%12.86%
YTD12.39%12.70%18.07%
1 year17.34%18.02%24.44%
3 years17.30%113.97%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FSR vs YVG comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSR (Fiba Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and YVG (Yapı Kredi Portföy Sarıyer Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FSR leads in 2 and YVG leads in 8. FSR is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YVG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: YVG leads (0.19% vs 0.19%). 1 week: YVG leads (−0.32% vs −0.32%). 1 month: FSR leads (−0.43% vs −0.44%). 3 months: YVG leads (5.75% vs 5.72%). 6 months: YVG leads (10.35% vs 9.97%). YTD: YVG leads (12.70% vs 12.39%). 1 year: YVG leads (18.02% vs 17.34%). 3 years: YVG leads (113.97% vs 17.30%). Size (TRY): YVG leads (6B vs 5.9B). Investors: FSR leads (2,382 vs 1,219).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FSR returned 12.39% and YVG returned 12.70%; over the last year FSR returned 17.34% and YVG returned 18.02%. Over the last month FSR returned −0.43% and YVG returned −0.44%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FSR has a size of TRY 5.9B with 2,382 investors, while YVG has a size of TRY 6B with 1,219 investors. YVG leads in size and FSR leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSR is 0 out of 7 and that of YVG is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.