Yatırımcı.AI

FSF vs IOG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSF (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and IOG (İş Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) side by side.

FSFIOG
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FSF vs IOG Fund Comparison
MetricFSFIOGCategory median
Daily0.29%0.77%0.19%
1 week0.69%−2.98%0.42%
1 month3.17%−4.49%0.94%
3 months10.03%13.16%5.89%
6 months21.66%1.87%12.86%
YTD32.36%−3.58%18.07%
1 year46.26%56.03%24.44%
3 years263.45%368.40%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FSF vs IOG comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSF (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and IOG (İş Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FSF leads in 6 and IOG leads in 5. FSF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IOG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IOG leads (0.77% vs 0.29%). 1 week: FSF leads (0.69% vs −2.98%). 1 month: FSF leads (3.17% vs −4.49%). 3 months: IOG leads (13.16% vs 10.03%). 6 months: FSF leads (21.66% vs 1.87%). YTD: FSF leads (32.36% vs −3.58%). 1 year: IOG leads (56.03% vs 46.26%). 3 years: IOG leads (368.40% vs 263.45%). Size (TRY): FSF leads (13.7B vs 11.9B). Investors: IOG leads (17,613 vs 7,756). Risk: FSF leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FSF returned 32.36% and IOG returned −3.58%; over the last year FSF returned 46.26% and IOG returned 56.03%. Over the last month FSF returned 3.17% and IOG returned −4.49%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FSF has a size of TRY 13.7B with 7,756 investors, while IOG has a size of TRY 11.9B with 17,613 investors. FSF leads in size and IOG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSF is 2 out of 7 and that of IOG is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.