Yatırımcı.AI

FS6 vs RTP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FS6 (One Portföy İkinci İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and RTP (Re-Pie Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

FS6RTP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FS6 vs RTP Fund Comparison
MetricFS6RTPCategory median
Daily0.13%−0.06%0.05%
1 week0.71%−0.07%0.44%
1 month1.81%−17.94%0.38%
3 months9.32%−26.44%3.95%
6 months24.90%−20.22%8.45%
YTD42.32%−16.34%16.06%
1 year58.44%−10.98%20.98%
3 years—180.28%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FS6 vs RTP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FS6 (One Portföy İkinci İstatistiksel Arbitraj Serbest Fon) and RTP (Re-Pie Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FS6 leads in 8 and RTP leads in 2. FS6 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RTP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Re-Pie Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FS6 leads (0.13% vs −0.06%). 1 week: FS6 leads (0.71% vs −0.07%). 1 month: FS6 leads (1.81% vs −17.94%). 3 months: FS6 leads (9.32% vs −26.44%). 6 months: FS6 leads (24.90% vs −20.22%). YTD: FS6 leads (42.32% vs −16.34%). 1 year: FS6 leads (58.44% vs −10.98%). Size (TRY): RTP leads (199.8M vs 194.2M). Investors: RTP leads (762 vs 217). Risk: FS6 leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FS6 returned 42.32% and RTP returned −16.34%; over the last year FS6 returned 58.44% and RTP returned −10.98%. Over the last month FS6 returned 1.81% and RTP returned −17.94%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, FS6 has a size of TRY 194.2M with 217 investors, while RTP has a size of TRY 199.8M with 762 investors. RTP leads in size and RTP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FS6 is 3 out of 7 and that of RTP is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.