FRC vs NZU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FRC (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) and NZU (Nurol Portföy Zümrüt Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FRC | NZU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −6.64% | — | −1.70% |
| Daily | 4.64% | 0.06% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −14.22% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −27.81% | 1.80% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | −35.76% | 5.90% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | −31.37% | 11.93% | 12.86% |
| YTD | −24.33% | 16.83% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | −21.61% | 22.23% | 24.44% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FRC vs NZU Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FRC (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) and NZU (Nurol Portföy Zümrüt Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FRC leads in 3 and NZU leads in 7. FRC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Foneva Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NZU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FRC leads (4.64% vs 0.06%). 1 week: NZU leads (0.42% vs −14.22%). 1 month: NZU leads (1.80% vs −27.81%). 3 months: NZU leads (5.90% vs −35.76%). 6 months: NZU leads (11.93% vs −31.37%). YTD: NZU leads (16.83% vs −24.33%). 1 year: NZU leads (22.23% vs −21.61%). Size (TRY): FRC leads (43.2M vs 40.2M). Investors: FRC leads (152 vs 19). Risk: NZU leads (0 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FRC or NZU?
Year to date FRC returned −24.33% and NZU returned 16.83%; over the last year FRC returned −21.61% and NZU returned 22.23%. Over the last month FRC returned −27.81% and NZU returned 1.80%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FRC or NZU?
As of September 28, 2026, FRC has a size of TRY 43.2M with 152 investors, while NZU has a size of TRY 40.2M with 19 investors. FRC leads in size and FRC leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FRC and NZU mean?
The CMB risk score of FRC is 6 out of 7 and that of NZU is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.