Yatırımcı.AI

FRC vs IZS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FRC (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and IZS (İstanbul Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) side by side.

FRCIZS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FRC vs IZS Fund Comparison
MetricFRCIZSCategory median
Today (est.)−0.98%—−1.16%
Daily−3.13%0.10%0.01%
1 week−5.51%0.59%0.30%
1 month−35.31%2.69%0.00%
3 months−56.15%17.57%3.96%
6 months−57.43%27.77%8.18%
YTD−47.21%21.02%15.73%
1 year−47.26%24.76%20.69%
3 years—146.58%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 24, 2026, 22:25.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FRC vs IZS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FRC (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and IZS (İstanbul Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FRC leads in 3 and IZS leads in 7. FRC is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Foneva Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IZS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IZS leads (0.10% vs −3.13%). 1 week: IZS leads (0.59% vs −5.51%). 1 month: IZS leads (2.69% vs −35.31%). 3 months: IZS leads (17.57% vs −56.15%). 6 months: IZS leads (27.77% vs −57.43%). YTD: IZS leads (21.02% vs −47.21%). 1 year: IZS leads (24.76% vs −47.26%). Size (TRY): FRC leads (28.4M vs 11.7M). Investors: FRC leads (135 vs 52). Risk: FRC leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FRC returned −47.21% and IZS returned 21.02%; over the last year FRC returned −47.26% and IZS returned 24.76%. Over the last month FRC returned −35.31% and IZS returned 2.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, FRC has a size of TRY 28.4M with 135 investors, while IZS has a size of TRY 11.7M with 52 investors. FRC leads in size and FRC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FRC is 6 out of 7 and that of IZS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.