FFZ vs IRF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFZ (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Inveo Portföy Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IRF (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FFZ | IRF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.59% | 0.17% | 0.36% |
| 1 week | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
| 1 month | −2.20% | 1.62% | −1.05% |
| 3 months | −0.18% | 10.59% | 6.35% |
| 6 months | 11.84% | 26.03% | 13.81% |
| YTD | 14.88% | 38.93% | 22.40% |
| 1 year | 26.69% | 58.64% | 35.81% |
| 3 years | 186.28% | 214.47% | 175.03% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FFZ vs IRF comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FFZ (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Inveo Portföy Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IRF (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FFZ leads in 4 and IRF leads in 7. FFZ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; IRF is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FFZ leads (0.59% vs 0.17%). 1 week: FFZ leads (0.27% vs 0.23%). 1 month: IRF leads (1.62% vs −2.20%). 3 months: IRF leads (10.59% vs −0.18%). 6 months: IRF leads (26.03% vs 11.84%). YTD: IRF leads (38.93% vs 14.88%). 1 year: IRF leads (58.64% vs 26.69%). 3 years: IRF leads (214.47% vs 186.28%). Size (TRY): FFZ leads (449.3M vs 403.8M). Investors: FFZ leads (4,130 vs 1,554). Risk: IRF leads (3 vs 4).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FFZ or IRF?
Year to date FFZ returned 14.88% and IRF returned 38.93%; over the last year FFZ returned 26.69% and IRF returned 58.64%. Over the last month FFZ returned −2.20% and IRF returned 1.62%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FFZ or IRF?
As of September 28, 2026, FFZ has a size of TRY 449.3M with 4,130 investors, while IRF has a size of TRY 403.8M with 1,554 investors. FFZ leads in size and FFZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FFZ and IRF mean?
The CMB risk score of FFZ is 4 out of 7 and that of IRF is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.