Yatırımcı.AI

HBN vs KKH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of HBN (Hsbc Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and KKH (İş Portföy Dengeli Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

HBNKKH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

HBN vs KKH Fund Comparison
MetricHBNKKHCategory median
Daily0.38%0.24%0.39%
1 week0.55%0.67%0.25%
1 month0.72%2.53%−1.05%
3 months5.63%6.61%6.44%
6 months14.27%14.94%13.81%
YTD23.37%15.78%22.40%
1 year30.03%35.88%35.81%
3 years157.73%183.46%175.03%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the HBN vs KKH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of HBN (Hsbc Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and KKH (İş Portföy Dengeli Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, HBN leads in 4 and KKH leads in 7. HBN is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Hsbc Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KKH is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: HBN leads (0.38% vs 0.24%). 1 week: KKH leads (0.67% vs 0.55%). 1 month: KKH leads (2.53% vs 0.72%). 3 months: KKH leads (6.61% vs 5.63%). 6 months: KKH leads (14.94% vs 14.27%). YTD: HBN leads (23.37% vs 15.78%). 1 year: KKH leads (35.88% vs 30.03%). 3 years: KKH leads (183.46% vs 157.73%). Size (TRY): HBN leads (526.1M vs 516.9M). Investors: KKH leads (4,886 vs 1,026). Risk: HBN leads (0 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date HBN returned 23.37% and KKH returned 15.78%; over the last year HBN returned 30.03% and KKH returned 35.88%. Over the last month HBN returned 0.72% and KKH returned 2.53%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, HBN has a size of TRY 526.1M with 1,026 investors, while KKH has a size of TRY 516.9M with 4,886 investors. HBN leads in size and KKH leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of HBN is 0 out of 7 and that of KKH is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.