Yatırımcı.AI

FMV vs RPS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FMV (Deniz Portföy Fmv Işık Üniversitesi Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and RPS (Rota Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

FMVRPS
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FMV vs RPS Fund Comparison
MetricFMVRPSCategory median
Daily0.20%−0.10%0.19%
1 week0.66%0.02%0.42%
1 month3.12%0.61%0.94%
3 months9.75%3.99%5.89%
6 months21.14%9.85%12.86%
YTD31.37%12.86%18.07%
1 year45.02%20.29%24.44%
3 years—113.49%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FMV vs RPS comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FMV (Deniz Portföy Fmv Işık Üniversitesi Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and RPS (Rota Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FMV leads in 8 and RPS leads in 2. FMV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; RPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FMV leads (0.20% vs −0.10%). 1 week: FMV leads (0.66% vs 0.02%). 1 month: FMV leads (3.12% vs 0.61%). 3 months: FMV leads (9.75% vs 3.99%). 6 months: FMV leads (21.14% vs 9.85%). YTD: FMV leads (31.37% vs 12.86%). 1 year: FMV leads (45.02% vs 20.29%). Size (TRY): FMV leads (169.6M vs 165M). Investors: RPS leads (79 vs 33). Risk: RPS leads (0 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FMV returned 31.37% and RPS returned 12.86%; over the last year FMV returned 45.02% and RPS returned 20.29%. Over the last month FMV returned 3.12% and RPS returned 0.61%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FMV has a size of TRY 169.6M with 33 investors, while RPS has a size of TRY 165M with 79 investors. FMV leads in size and RPS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FMV is 2 out of 7 and that of RPS is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.