FPR vs RPS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FPR (Strateji Portföy Forest Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) and RPS (Rota Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FPR | RPS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −2.33% | — | −2.04% |
| Daily | 0.68% | −0.10% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 1.69% | 0.02% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −4.35% | 0.61% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | −3.58% | 3.99% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 4.66% | 9.85% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 19.77% | 12.86% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 25.27% | 20.29% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 133.61% | 113.49% | 111.64% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FPR vs RPS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FPR (Strateji Portföy Forest Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) and RPS (Rota Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FPR leads in 6 and RPS leads in 5. FPR is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Strateji Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FPR leads (0.68% vs −0.10%). 1 week: FPR leads (1.69% vs 0.02%). 1 month: RPS leads (0.61% vs −4.35%). 3 months: RPS leads (3.99% vs −3.58%). 6 months: RPS leads (9.85% vs 4.66%). YTD: FPR leads (19.77% vs 12.86%). 1 year: FPR leads (25.27% vs 20.29%). 3 years: FPR leads (133.61% vs 113.49%). Size (TRY): FPR leads (173.8M vs 165M). Investors: RPS leads (79 vs 31). Risk: RPS leads (0 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FPR or RPS?
Year to date FPR returned 19.77% and RPS returned 12.86%; over the last year FPR returned 25.27% and RPS returned 20.29%. Over the last month FPR returned −4.35% and RPS returned 0.61%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FPR or RPS?
As of September 28, 2026, FPR has a size of TRY 173.8M with 31 investors, while RPS has a size of TRY 165M with 79 investors. FPR leads in size and RPS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FPR and RPS mean?
The CMB risk score of FPR is 6 out of 7 and that of RPS is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.