FJB vs MOZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FJB (Fiba Portföy Blok Zinciri Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) and MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FJB | MOZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.64% | 0.64% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 2.92% | 1.82% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 4.02% | 1.66% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 9.50% | 6.37% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 40.00% | 23.50% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 31.52% | 23.82% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 34.22% | — | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 301.57% | — | 111.64% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FJB vs MOZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FJB (Fiba Portföy Blok Zinciri Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) and MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FJB leads in 8 and MOZ leads in 1. FJB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MOZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FJB leads (0.64% vs 0.64%). 1 week: FJB leads (2.92% vs 1.82%). 1 month: FJB leads (4.02% vs 1.66%). 3 months: FJB leads (9.50% vs 6.37%). 6 months: FJB leads (40.00% vs 23.50%). YTD: FJB leads (31.52% vs 23.82%). Size (TRY): FJB leads (348.2M vs 343.9M). Investors: FJB leads (666 vs 96). Risk: MOZ leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FJB or MOZ?
Year to date FJB returned 31.52% and MOZ returned 23.82%; over the last year FJB returned 34.22% and MOZ returned —. Over the last month FJB returned 4.02% and MOZ returned 1.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FJB or MOZ?
As of September 28, 2026, FJB has a size of TRY 348.2M with 666 investors, while MOZ has a size of TRY 343.9M with 96 investors. FJB leads in size and FJB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FJB and MOZ mean?
The CMB risk score of FJB is 6 out of 7 and that of MOZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.