FIV vs MHO Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIV (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHO (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FIV | MHO | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.92% | 0.55% | 0.21% |
| 1 week | 2.30% | 2.40% | 1.17% |
| 1 month | −4.60% | 0.01% | −0.49% |
| 3 months | −4.74% | 0.78% | −0.87% |
| 6 months | −1.10% | 3.16% | 0.68% |
| YTD | 26.12% | 25.71% | 22.53% |
| 1 year | 31.26% | 33.23% | 29.33% |
| 3 years | 125.72% | 179.91% | 156.25% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FIV vs MHO Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FIV (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHO (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIV leads in 3 and MHO leads in 8. FIV is a Variable Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MHO is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FIV leads (0.92% vs 0.55%). 1 week: MHO leads (2.40% vs 2.30%). 1 month: MHO leads (0.01% vs −4.60%). 3 months: MHO leads (0.78% vs −4.74%). 6 months: MHO leads (3.16% vs −1.10%). YTD: FIV leads (26.12% vs 25.71%). 1 year: MHO leads (33.23% vs 31.26%). 3 years: MHO leads (179.91% vs 125.72%). Size (TRY): MHO leads (50.7M vs 48.8M). Investors: FIV leads (803 vs 485). Risk: MHO leads (5 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FIV or MHO?
Year to date FIV returned 26.12% and MHO returned 25.71%; over the last year FIV returned 31.26% and MHO returned 33.23%. Over the last month FIV returned −4.60% and MHO returned 0.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FIV or MHO?
As of November 13, 2026, FIV has a size of TRY 48.8M with 803 investors, while MHO has a size of TRY 50.7M with 485 investors. MHO leads in size and FIV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FIV and MHO mean?
The CMB risk score of FIV is 7 out of 7 and that of MHO is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.