FIS vs RZM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIS (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and RZM (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FIS | RZM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.08% |
| 1 week | 0.52% | 0.54% | 0.47% |
| 1 month | 0.99% | −0.09% | −0.10% |
| 3 months | 4.99% | 5.79% | 4.09% |
| 6 months | 9.84% | 10.41% | 8.69% |
| YTD | 28.01% | 34.33% | 27.71% |
| 1 year | 32.72% | 41.22% | 35.73% |
| 3 years | 108.95% | 177.23% | 144.03% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FIS vs RZM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FIS (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and RZM (AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIS leads in 1 and RZM leads in 10. FIS is a Shariah-compliant Standard Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; RZM is a Shariah-compliant Standard Fund fund managed by AXA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RZM leads (0.21% vs 0.16%). 1 week: RZM leads (0.54% vs 0.52%). 1 month: FIS leads (0.99% vs −0.09%). 3 months: RZM leads (5.79% vs 4.99%). 6 months: RZM leads (10.41% vs 9.84%). YTD: RZM leads (34.33% vs 28.01%). 1 year: RZM leads (41.22% vs 32.72%). 3 years: RZM leads (177.23% vs 108.95%). Size (TRY): RZM leads (93M vs 30.2M). Investors: RZM leads (2,930 vs 1,219). Risk: RZM leads (3 vs 4).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FIS or RZM?
Year to date FIS returned 28.01% and RZM returned 34.33%; over the last year FIS returned 32.72% and RZM returned 41.22%. Over the last month FIS returned 0.99% and RZM returned −0.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FIS or RZM?
As of November 12, 2026, FIS has a size of TRY 30.2M with 1,219 investors, while RZM has a size of TRY 93M with 2,930 investors. RZM leads in size and RZM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FIS and RZM mean?
The CMB risk score of FIS is 4 out of 7 and that of RZM is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.