FIS vs MHS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIS (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHS (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FIS | MHS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.16% | 0.01% | 0.08% |
| 1 week | 0.52% | 0.47% | 0.47% |
| 1 month | 0.99% | 0.05% | −0.10% |
| 3 months | 4.99% | 3.56% | 4.09% |
| 6 months | 9.84% | 6.77% | 8.69% |
| YTD | 28.01% | 27.42% | 27.71% |
| 1 year | 32.72% | 33.20% | 35.73% |
| 3 years | 108.95% | 157.79% | 144.03% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FIS vs MHS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FIS (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHS (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIS leads in 6 and MHS leads in 5. FIS is a Shariah-compliant Standard Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MHS is a Shariah-compliant Standard Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FIS leads (0.16% vs 0.01%). 1 week: FIS leads (0.52% vs 0.47%). 1 month: FIS leads (0.99% vs 0.05%). 3 months: FIS leads (4.99% vs 3.56%). 6 months: FIS leads (9.84% vs 6.77%). YTD: FIS leads (28.01% vs 27.42%). 1 year: MHS leads (33.20% vs 32.72%). 3 years: MHS leads (157.79% vs 108.95%). Size (TRY): MHS leads (82.1M vs 30.2M). Investors: MHS leads (3,108 vs 1,219). Risk: MHS leads (3 vs 4).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FIS or MHS?
Year to date FIS returned 28.01% and MHS returned 27.42%; over the last year FIS returned 32.72% and MHS returned 33.20%. Over the last month FIS returned 0.99% and MHS returned 0.05%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FIS or MHS?
As of November 12, 2026, FIS has a size of TRY 30.2M with 1,219 investors, while MHS has a size of TRY 82.1M with 3,108 investors. MHS leads in size and MHS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FIS and MHS mean?
The CMB risk score of FIS is 4 out of 7 and that of MHS is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.