FIS vs MHS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIS (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHS (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FIS | MHS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.08% | 0.24% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −0.01% | 0.04% | 0.02% |
| 1 month | 0.52% | −0.02% | 0.25% |
| 3 months | 6.75% | 5.37% | 6.61% |
| 6 months | 16.60% | 15.74% | 16.97% |
| YTD | 25.81% | 27.14% | 26.48% |
| 1 year | 32.57% | 34.61% | 38.10% |
| 3 years | 109.37% | 157.17% | 144.91% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FIS vs MHS comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FIS (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MHS (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIS leads in 3 and MHS leads in 8. FIS is a Shariah-compliant Standard Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; MHS is a Shariah-compliant Standard Fund fund managed by Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MHS leads (0.24% vs 0.08%). 1 week: MHS leads (0.04% vs −0.01%). 1 month: FIS leads (0.52% vs −0.02%). 3 months: FIS leads (6.75% vs 5.37%). 6 months: FIS leads (16.60% vs 15.74%). YTD: MHS leads (27.14% vs 25.81%). 1 year: MHS leads (34.61% vs 32.57%). 3 years: MHS leads (157.17% vs 109.37%). Size (TRY): MHS leads (80M vs 21.5M). Investors: MHS leads (2,943 vs 1,062). Risk: MHS leads (3 vs 4).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FIS or MHS?
Year to date FIS returned 25.81% and MHS returned 27.14%; over the last year FIS returned 32.57% and MHS returned 34.61%. Over the last month FIS returned 0.52% and MHS returned −0.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FIS or MHS?
As of September 28, 2026, FIS has a size of TRY 21.5M with 1,062 investors, while MHS has a size of TRY 80M with 2,943 investors. MHS leads in size and MHS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FIS and MHS mean?
The CMB risk score of FIS is 4 out of 7 and that of MHS is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.