Yatırımcı.AI

FIG vs IRT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FIG (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IRT (Inveo Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) side by side.

FIGIRT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FIG vs IRT Fund Comparison
MetricFIGIRTCategory median
Daily−1.62%0.53%−0.41%
1 week−2.77%−2.50%−1.69%
1 month−5.41%−4.22%−3.34%
3 months−0.63%0.96%0.00%
6 months3.07%17.49%4.10%
YTD25.09%40.60%21.58%
1 year38.23%59.42%30.90%
3 years191.89%264.18%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FIG vs IRT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FIG (HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IRT (Inveo Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FIG leads in 2 and IRT leads in 9. FIG is a Variable Fund fund managed by HDI Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; IRT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IRT leads (0.53% vs −1.62%). 1 week: IRT leads (−2.50% vs −2.77%). 1 month: IRT leads (−4.22% vs −5.41%). 3 months: IRT leads (0.96% vs −0.63%). 6 months: IRT leads (17.49% vs 3.07%). YTD: IRT leads (40.60% vs 25.09%). 1 year: IRT leads (59.42% vs 38.23%). 3 years: IRT leads (264.18% vs 191.89%). Size (TRY): IRT leads (107.5M vs 105.6M). Investors: FIG leads (1,573 vs 1,264). Risk: FIG leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FIG returned 25.09% and IRT returned 40.60%; over the last year FIG returned 38.23% and IRT returned 59.42%. Over the last month FIG returned −5.41% and IRT returned −4.22%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, FIG has a size of TRY 105.6M with 1,573 investors, while IRT has a size of TRY 107.5M with 1,264 investors. IRT leads in size and FIG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FIG is 3 out of 7 and that of IRT is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.