Yatırımcı.AI

AGC vs IRT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AGC (Ak Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and IRT (Inveo Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) side by side.

AGCIRT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AGC vs IRT Fund Comparison
MetricAGCIRTCategory median
Daily0.07%0.53%−0.41%
1 week0.57%−2.50%−1.69%
1 month2.08%−4.22%−3.34%
3 months6.44%0.96%0.00%
6 months13.18%17.49%4.10%
YTD21.43%40.60%21.58%
1 year27.13%59.42%30.90%
3 years124.55%264.18%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AGC vs IRT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AGC (Ak Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and IRT (Inveo Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AGC leads in 6 and IRT leads in 5. AGC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IRT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IRT leads (0.53% vs 0.07%). 1 week: AGC leads (0.57% vs −2.50%). 1 month: AGC leads (2.08% vs −4.22%). 3 months: AGC leads (6.44% vs 0.96%). 6 months: IRT leads (17.49% vs 13.18%). YTD: IRT leads (40.60% vs 21.43%). 1 year: IRT leads (59.42% vs 27.13%). 3 years: IRT leads (264.18% vs 124.55%). Size (TRY): AGC leads (108M vs 107.5M). Investors: AGC leads (2,458 vs 1,264). Risk: AGC leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AGC returned 21.43% and IRT returned 40.60%; over the last year AGC returned 27.13% and IRT returned 59.42%. Over the last month AGC returned 2.08% and IRT returned −4.22%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, AGC has a size of TRY 108M with 2,458 investors, while IRT has a size of TRY 107.5M with 1,264 investors. AGC leads in size and AGC leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AGC is 2 out of 7 and that of IRT is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.