Yatırımcı.AI

FFP vs NBO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FFP (QNB Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) and NBO (Neo Portföy Borçlanma Aracı Fonları Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.

FFPNBO
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FFP vs NBO Fund Comparison
MetricFFPNBOCategory median
Daily−0.81%0.10%−0.81%
1 week−1.08%0.70%−1.35%
1 month−1.51%3.04%−1.46%
3 months5.43%10.12%5.43%
6 months10.06%22.25%13.12%
YTD16.17%36.02%21.52%
1 year33.76%53.00%34.01%
3 years189.84%—172.01%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FFP vs NBO Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FFP (QNB Portföy Fon Sepeti Fonu) and NBO (Neo Portföy Borçlanma Aracı Fonları Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FFP leads in 1 and NBO leads in 9. FFP is a Fund of Funds fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NBO is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NBO leads (0.10% vs −0.81%). 1 week: NBO leads (0.70% vs −1.08%). 1 month: NBO leads (3.04% vs −1.51%). 3 months: NBO leads (10.12% vs 5.43%). 6 months: NBO leads (22.25% vs 10.06%). YTD: NBO leads (36.02% vs 16.17%). 1 year: NBO leads (53.00% vs 33.76%). Size (TRY): NBO leads (2.3B vs 1.9B). Investors: FFP leads (2,275 vs 316). Risk: NBO leads (2 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FFP returned 16.17% and NBO returned 36.02%; over the last year FFP returned 33.76% and NBO returned 53.00%. Over the last month FFP returned −1.51% and NBO returned 3.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, FFP has a size of TRY 1.9B with 2,275 investors, while NBO has a size of TRY 2.3B with 316 investors. NBO leads in size and FFP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FFP is 4 out of 7 and that of NBO is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.