Yatırımcı.AI

FES vs IEE Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FES (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IEE (Zurıch Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

FESIEE
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

FES vs IEE Fund Comparison
MetricFESIEECategory median
Daily0.20%0.17%0.32%
1 week0.19%−0.06%0.42%
1 month−0.36%−2.48%−1.48%
3 months4.39%3.24%4.48%
6 months15.43%8.82%14.82%
YTD20.87%19.48%25.33%
1 year31.35%28.05%35.72%
3 years182.24%119.50%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the FES vs IEE comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FES (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IEE (Zurıch Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dengeli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FES leads in 9 and IEE leads in 1. FES is a Variable Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; IEE is a Variable Fund fund managed by Nn Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FES leads (0.20% vs 0.17%). 1 week: FES leads (0.19% vs −0.06%). 1 month: FES leads (−0.36% vs −2.48%). 3 months: FES leads (4.39% vs 3.24%). 6 months: FES leads (15.43% vs 8.82%). YTD: FES leads (20.87% vs 19.48%). 1 year: FES leads (31.35% vs 28.05%). 3 years: FES leads (182.24% vs 119.50%). Size (TRY): FES leads (1.6B vs 1.6B). Investors: IEE leads (110,061 vs 32,328).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date FES returned 20.87% and IEE returned 19.48%; over the last year FES returned 31.35% and IEE returned 28.05%. Over the last month FES returned −0.36% and IEE returned −2.48%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FES has a size of TRY 1.6B with 32,328 investors, while IEE has a size of TRY 1.6B with 110,061 investors. FES leads in size and IEE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FES is 4 out of 7 and that of IEE is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.