Yatırımcı.AI

FDG vs RKC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FDG (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and RKC (Rota Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) side by side.

FDGRKC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FDG vs RKC Fund Comparison
MetricFDGRKCCategory median
Today (est.)—1.96%1.03%
Daily−0.00%0.04%0.03%
1 week−0.20%1.12%0.83%
1 month−0.15%1.03%−1.16%
3 months0.28%3.74%−0.11%
6 months−6.75%9.51%0.00%
YTD17.66%32.04%22.14%
1 year26.46%43.68%29.37%
3 years60.69%—154.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Nov 12, 2026, 12:24.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FDG vs RKC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FDG (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and RKC (Rota Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FDG leads in 2 and RKC leads in 8. FDG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Foneva Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RKC is a Variable Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RKC leads (0.04% vs 0.00%). 1 week: RKC leads (1.12% vs −0.20%). 1 month: RKC leads (1.03% vs −0.15%). 3 months: RKC leads (3.74% vs 0.28%). 6 months: RKC leads (9.51% vs −6.75%). YTD: RKC leads (32.04% vs 17.66%). 1 year: RKC leads (43.68% vs 26.46%). Size (TRY): FDG leads (25.6M vs 24.6M). Investors: FDG leads (448 vs 153). Risk: RKC leads (3 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FDG returned 17.66% and RKC returned 32.04%; over the last year FDG returned 26.46% and RKC returned 43.68%. Over the last month FDG returned −0.15% and RKC returned 1.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, FDG has a size of TRY 25.6M with 448 investors, while RKC has a size of TRY 24.6M with 153 investors. FDG leads in size and FDG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FDG is 7 out of 7 and that of RKC is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.