DID vs FDG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DID (Deniz Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and FDG (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DID | FDG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.54% | 0.03% | −1.41% |
| 1 week | 1.09% | −0.07% | −0.69% |
| 1 month | −2.67% | −0.37% | −3.96% |
| 3 months | 0.03% | −0.56% | −1.43% |
| 6 months | 6.20% | −3.69% | 1.85% |
| YTD | 17.16% | 17.54% | 17.97% |
| 1 year | 23.23% | 26.02% | 23.69% |
| 3 years | — | 60.69% | 149.99% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DID vs FDG Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DID (Deniz Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and FDG (Fonmap Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DID leads in 4 and FDG leads in 6. DID is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FDG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Foneva Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FDG leads (0.03% vs −0.54%). 1 week: DID leads (1.09% vs −0.07%). 1 month: FDG leads (−0.37% vs −2.67%). 3 months: DID leads (0.03% vs −0.56%). 6 months: DID leads (6.20% vs −3.69%). YTD: FDG leads (17.54% vs 17.16%). 1 year: FDG leads (26.02% vs 23.23%). Size (TRY): FDG leads (27.3M vs 26.1M). Investors: FDG leads (459 vs 149). Risk: DID leads (5 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DID or FDG?
Year to date DID returned 17.16% and FDG returned 17.54%; over the last year DID returned 23.23% and FDG returned 26.02%. Over the last month DID returned −2.67% and FDG returned −0.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DID or FDG?
As of November 2, 2026, DID has a size of TRY 26.1M with 149 investors, while FDG has a size of TRY 27.3M with 459 investors. FDG leads in size and FDG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DID and FDG mean?
The CMB risk score of DID is 5 out of 7 and that of FDG is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.