Yatırımcı.AI

FBZ vs RTP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBZ (Fiba Portföy Teknoloji Serbest Fon) and RTP (Re-Pıe Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

FBZRTP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FBZ vs RTP Fund Comparison
MetricFBZRTPCategory median
Daily1.06%−0.62%0.19%
1 week2.27%−12.31%0.42%
1 month1.93%−15.02%0.94%
3 months9.34%−19.81%5.89%
6 months37.69%−12.53%12.86%
YTD32.86%−14.73%18.07%
1 year43.53%−1.66%24.44%
3 years199.64%198.00%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FBZ vs RTP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBZ (Fiba Portföy Teknoloji Serbest Fon) and RTP (Re-Pıe Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, FBZ leads in 9 and RTP leads in 2. FBZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RTP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Re-Pıe Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FBZ leads (1.06% vs −0.62%). 1 week: FBZ leads (2.27% vs −12.31%). 1 month: FBZ leads (1.93% vs −15.02%). 3 months: FBZ leads (9.34% vs −19.81%). 6 months: FBZ leads (37.69% vs −12.53%). YTD: FBZ leads (32.86% vs −14.73%). 1 year: FBZ leads (43.53% vs −1.66%). 3 years: FBZ leads (199.64% vs 198.00%). Size (TRY): FBZ leads (282.9M vs 280.7M). Investors: RTP leads (901 vs 370). Risk: RTP leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FBZ returned 32.86% and RTP returned −14.73%; over the last year FBZ returned 43.53% and RTP returned −1.66%. Over the last month FBZ returned 1.93% and RTP returned −15.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, FBZ has a size of TRY 282.9M with 370 investors, while RTP has a size of TRY 280.7M with 901 investors. FBZ leads in size and RTP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBZ is 6 out of 7 and that of RTP is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.