Yatırımcı.AI

CHO vs EVM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CHO (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and EVM (Deniz Portföy Enerji ve Madencilik Sektörü Değişken Fon) side by side.

CHOEVM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CHO vs EVM Fund Comparison
MetricCHOEVMCategory median
Daily−2.41%−1.86%−1.21%
1 week−3.88%−1.53%−2.11%
1 month−6.70%−3.96%−4.66%
3 months−1.55%1.54%−1.44%
6 months−1.17%1.57%2.69%
YTD14.56%9.69%20.08%
1 year21.47%—28.83%
3 years175.30%—156.57%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CHO vs EVM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CHO (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Atak Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and EVM (Deniz Portföy Enerji ve Madencilik Sektörü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, CHO leads in 1 and EVM leads in 7. CHO is a Variable Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; EVM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EVM leads (−1.86% vs −2.41%). 1 week: EVM leads (−1.53% vs −3.88%). 1 month: EVM leads (−3.96% vs −6.70%). 3 months: EVM leads (1.54% vs −1.55%). 6 months: EVM leads (1.57% vs −1.17%). YTD: CHO leads (14.56% vs 9.69%). Size (TRY): EVM leads (58.3M vs 56.4M). Investors: EVM leads (525 vs 242).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CHO returned 14.56% and EVM returned 9.69%; over the last year CHO returned 21.47% and EVM returned —. Over the last month CHO returned −6.70% and EVM returned −3.96%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, CHO has a size of TRY 56.4M with 242 investors, while EVM has a size of TRY 58.3M with 525 investors. EVM leads in size and EVM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CHO is 6 out of 7 and that of EVM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.