EVM vs MTD Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EVM (Deniz Portföy Enerji ve Madencilik Sektörü Değişken Fon) and MTD (BV Portföy Malzeme Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | EVM | MTD | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.86% | −2.46% | −1.21% |
| 1 week | −1.53% | −2.64% | −2.11% |
| 1 month | −3.96% | −12.88% | −4.66% |
| 3 months | 1.54% | −9.47% | −1.44% |
| 6 months | 1.57% | −19.61% | 2.69% |
| YTD | 9.69% | 2.96% | 20.08% |
| 1 year | — | 0.00% | 28.83% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the EVM vs MTD Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EVM (Deniz Portföy Enerji ve Madencilik Sektörü Değişken Fon) and MTD (BV Portföy Malzeme Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EVM leads in 7 and MTD leads in 2. EVM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MTD is a Variable Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EVM leads (−1.86% vs −2.46%). 1 week: EVM leads (−1.53% vs −2.64%). 1 month: EVM leads (−3.96% vs −12.88%). 3 months: EVM leads (1.54% vs −9.47%). 6 months: EVM leads (1.57% vs −19.61%). YTD: EVM leads (9.69% vs 2.96%). Size (TRY): EVM leads (58.3M vs 55.4M). Investors: MTD leads (1,044 vs 525). Risk: MTD leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, EVM or MTD?
Year to date EVM returned 9.69% and MTD returned 2.96%; over the last year EVM returned — and MTD returned 0.00%. Over the last month EVM returned −3.96% and MTD returned −12.88%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EVM or MTD?
As of October 23, 2026, EVM has a size of TRY 58.3M with 525 investors, while MTD has a size of TRY 55.4M with 1,044 investors. EVM leads in size and MTD leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EVM and MTD mean?
The CMB risk score of EVM is 6 out of 7 and that of MTD is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.