ESP vs ICS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ESP (Aura Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and ICS (TEB Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ESP | ICS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.49% | 0.07% | 0.06% |
| 1 week | 9.47% | 0.49% | 0.56% |
| 1 month | −17.41% | 2.47% | 1.84% |
| 3 months | −45.75% | 4.63% | 3.29% |
| 6 months | −61.18% | 7.68% | 7.90% |
| YTD | −73.91% | 15.78% | 17.53% |
| 1 year | −78.60% | 17.91% | 21.48% |
| 3 years | −79.14% | 71.60% | 105.66% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ESP vs ICS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ESP (Aura Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and ICS (TEB Portföy Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ESP leads in 3 and ICS leads in 7. ESP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aura Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ICS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ICS leads (0.07% vs −0.49%). 1 week: ESP leads (9.47% vs 0.49%). 1 month: ICS leads (2.47% vs −17.41%). 3 months: ICS leads (4.63% vs −45.75%). 6 months: ICS leads (7.68% vs −61.18%). YTD: ICS leads (15.78% vs −73.91%). 1 year: ICS leads (17.91% vs −78.60%). 3 years: ICS leads (71.60% vs −79.14%). Size (TRY): ESP leads (12M vs 11.8M). Investors: ESP leads (202 vs 59).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ESP or ICS?
Year to date ESP returned −73.91% and ICS returned 15.78%; over the last year ESP returned −78.60% and ICS returned 17.91%. Over the last month ESP returned −17.41% and ICS returned 2.47%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ESP or ICS?
As of November 12, 2026, ESP has a size of TRY 12M with 202 investors, while ICS has a size of TRY 11.8M with 59 investors. ESP leads in size and ESP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ESP and ICS mean?
The CMB risk score of ESP is 7 out of 7 and that of ICS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.