Yatırımcı.AI

EPA vs OGD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EPA (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and OGD (Oyak Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) side by side.

EPAOGD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EPA vs OGD Fund Comparison
MetricEPAOGDCategory median
Daily0.09%−0.05%0.03%
1 week0.67%0.03%0.06%
1 month2.93%−3.32%0.00%
3 months9.74%6.24%6.19%
6 months20.89%−4.93%12.49%
YTD35.12%5.72%28.76%
1 year45.03%6.50%36.24%
3 years—239.24%159.62%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EPA vs OGD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EPA (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and OGD (Oyak Portföy Altın Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EPA leads in 8 and OGD leads in 2. EPA is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OGD is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Oyak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EPA leads (0.09% vs −0.05%). 1 week: EPA leads (0.67% vs 0.03%). 1 month: EPA leads (2.93% vs −3.32%). 3 months: EPA leads (9.74% vs 6.24%). 6 months: EPA leads (20.89% vs −4.93%). YTD: EPA leads (35.12% vs 5.72%). 1 year: EPA leads (45.03% vs 6.50%). Size (TRY): OGD leads (734.7M vs 685.2M). Investors: OGD leads (2,874 vs 126). Risk: EPA leads (1 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EPA returned 35.12% and OGD returned 5.72%; over the last year EPA returned 45.03% and OGD returned 6.50%. Over the last month EPA returned 2.93% and OGD returned −3.32%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, EPA has a size of TRY 685.2M with 126 investors, while OGD has a size of TRY 734.7M with 2,874 investors. OGD leads in size and OGD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EPA is 1 out of 7 and that of OGD is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.