Yatırımcı.AI

EIL vs PPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EIL (Astra Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPP (Perform Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

EILPPP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EIL vs PPP Fund Comparison
MetricEILPPPCategory median
Daily0.10%0.10%0.09%
1 week0.69%0.71%0.69%
1 month3.11%3.00%2.97%
3 months10.20%9.79%9.76%
6 months21.87%21.00%20.90%
YTD37.13%35.80%35.49%
1 year48.02%45.93%45.62%
3 years268.73%80.54%255.49%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EIL vs PPP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EIL (Astra Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPP (Perform Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EIL leads in 8 and PPP leads in 2. EIL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Perform Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPP leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: PPP leads (0.71% vs 0.69%). 1 month: EIL leads (3.11% vs 3.00%). 3 months: EIL leads (10.20% vs 9.79%). 6 months: EIL leads (21.87% vs 21.00%). YTD: EIL leads (37.13% vs 35.80%). 1 year: EIL leads (48.02% vs 45.93%). 3 years: EIL leads (268.73% vs 80.54%). Size (TRY): EIL leads (3.1B vs 2B). Investors: EIL leads (1,038 vs 300).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EIL returned 37.13% and PPP returned 35.80%; over the last year EIL returned 48.02% and PPP returned 45.93%. Over the last month EIL returned 3.11% and PPP returned 3.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, EIL has a size of TRY 3.1B with 1,038 investors, while PPP has a size of TRY 2B with 300 investors. EIL leads in size and EIL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EIL is 2 out of 7 and that of PPP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.