Yatırımcı.AI

EIL vs PLR Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EIL (Astra Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PLR (Osmanlı Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) side by side.

EILPLR
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EIL vs PLR Fund Comparison
MetricEILPLRCategory median
Daily0.10%0.10%0.10%
1 week0.77%0.75%0.71%
1 month3.45%3.28%3.17%
3 months10.43%10.24%10.01%
6 months22.14%21.79%21.27%
YTD33.87%33.70%32.49%
1 year48.61%48.04%46.26%
3 years267.19%—255.20%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EIL vs PLR Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EIL (Astra Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PLR (Osmanlı Portföy Para Piyasası Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EIL leads in 8 and PLR leads in 1. EIL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PLR is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PLR leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: EIL leads (0.77% vs 0.75%). 1 month: EIL leads (3.45% vs 3.28%). 3 months: EIL leads (10.43% vs 10.24%). 6 months: EIL leads (22.14% vs 21.79%). YTD: EIL leads (33.87% vs 33.70%). 1 year: EIL leads (48.61% vs 48.04%). Size (TRY): EIL leads (649.8M vs 615.6M). Investors: EIL leads (1,030 vs 867).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EIL returned 33.87% and PLR returned 33.70%; over the last year EIL returned 48.61% and PLR returned 48.04%. Over the last month EIL returned 3.45% and PLR returned 3.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, EIL has a size of TRY 649.8M with 1,030 investors, while PLR has a size of TRY 615.6M with 867 investors. EIL leads in size and EIL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EIL is 2 out of 7 and that of PLR is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.