Yatırımcı.AI

EIL vs NVB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EIL (Astra Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and NVB (Neo Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fon) side by side.

EILNVB
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EIL vs NVB Fund Comparison
MetricEILNVBCategory median
Daily0.10%−0.79%0.10%
1 week0.69%−0.14%0.69%
1 month3.12%2.19%2.99%
3 months10.23%8.90%9.77%
6 months21.75%19.83%20.79%
YTD36.99%34.58%35.37%
1 year48.03%45.03%45.64%
3 years268.38%260.27%255.18%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EIL vs NVB Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EIL (Astra Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and NVB (Neo Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EIL leads in 9 and NVB leads in 1. EIL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVB is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EIL leads (0.10% vs −0.79%). 1 week: EIL leads (0.69% vs −0.14%). 1 month: EIL leads (3.12% vs 2.19%). 3 months: EIL leads (10.23% vs 8.90%). 6 months: EIL leads (21.75% vs 19.83%). YTD: EIL leads (36.99% vs 34.58%). 1 year: EIL leads (48.03% vs 45.03%). 3 years: EIL leads (268.38% vs 260.27%). Size (TRY): EIL leads (3.1B vs 2.5B). Investors: NVB leads (3,401 vs 1,049).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EIL returned 36.99% and NVB returned 34.58%; over the last year EIL returned 48.03% and NVB returned 45.03%. Over the last month EIL returned 3.12% and NVB returned 2.19%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, EIL has a size of TRY 3.1B with 1,049 investors, while NVB has a size of TRY 2.5B with 3,401 investors. EIL leads in size and NVB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EIL is 2 out of 7 and that of NVB is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.