EIK vs GHG Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EIK (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Dış Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GHG (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Dış Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | EIK | GHG | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.49% | −0.23% | −0.23% |
| 1 week | −0.59% | −0.31% | −0.19% |
| 1 month | −1.69% | −1.14% | −0.98% |
| 3 months | 1.87% | 3.42% | 3.18% |
| 6 months | 11.05% | 12.25% | 12.25% |
| YTD | 10.91% | 13.56% | 13.02% |
| 1 year | 18.27% | 21.58% | 21.58% |
| 3 years | 123.04% | 135.40% | 135.40% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the EIK vs GHG comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EIK (Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Dış Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GHG (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Dış Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, EIK leads in 1 and GHG leads in 10. EIK is a External Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Hdı Fiba Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; GHG is a External Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GHG leads (−0.23% vs −0.49%). 1 week: GHG leads (−0.31% vs −0.59%). 1 month: GHG leads (−1.14% vs −1.69%). 3 months: GHG leads (3.42% vs 1.87%). 6 months: GHG leads (12.25% vs 11.05%). YTD: GHG leads (13.56% vs 10.91%). 1 year: GHG leads (21.58% vs 18.27%). 3 years: GHG leads (135.40% vs 123.04%). Size (TRY): GHG leads (5.8B vs 1.3B). Investors: GHG leads (58,452 vs 32,033). Risk: EIK leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, EIK or GHG?
Year to date EIK returned 10.91% and GHG returned 13.56%; over the last year EIK returned 18.27% and GHG returned 21.58%. Over the last month EIK returned −1.69% and GHG returned −1.14%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EIK or GHG?
As of September 28, 2026, EIK has a size of TRY 1.3B with 32,033 investors, while GHG has a size of TRY 5.8B with 58,452 investors. GHG leads in size and GHG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EIK and GHG mean?
The CMB risk score of EIK is 4 out of 7 and that of GHG is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.