Yatırımcı.AI

AVG vs GHG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AVG (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dış Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GHG (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Dış Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

AVGGHG
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AVG vs GHG Fund Comparison
MetricAVGGHGCategory median
Daily−0.10%−0.23%−0.23%
1 week−0.09%−0.31%−0.19%
1 month−0.40%−1.14%−0.98%
3 months3.65%3.42%3.18%
6 months12.57%12.25%12.25%
YTD13.44%13.56%13.02%
1 year21.43%21.58%21.58%
3 years129.87%135.40%135.40%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AVG vs GHG comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AVG (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dış Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GHG (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Dış Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AVG leads in 7 and GHG leads in 4. AVG is a External Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GHG is a External Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AVG leads (−0.10% vs −0.23%). 1 week: AVG leads (−0.09% vs −0.31%). 1 month: AVG leads (−0.40% vs −1.14%). 3 months: AVG leads (3.65% vs 3.42%). 6 months: AVG leads (12.57% vs 12.25%). YTD: GHG leads (13.56% vs 13.44%). 1 year: GHG leads (21.58% vs 21.43%). 3 years: GHG leads (135.40% vs 129.87%). Size (TRY): AVG leads (10.4B vs 5.8B). Investors: AVG leads (175,807 vs 58,452). Risk: GHG leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AVG returned 13.44% and GHG returned 13.56%; over the last year AVG returned 21.43% and GHG returned 21.58%. Over the last month AVG returned −0.40% and GHG returned −1.14%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AVG has a size of TRY 10.4B with 175,807 investors, while GHG has a size of TRY 5.8B with 58,452 investors. AVG leads in size and AVG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AVG is 6 out of 7 and that of GHG is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.