Yatırımcı.AI

EDU vs URA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EDU (İş Portföy Tev Eğitime Destek Değişken Fon) and URA (Ata Portföy Enerji Değişken Fon) side by side.

EDUURA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EDU vs URA Fund Comparison
MetricEDUURACategory median
Daily−2.46%−3.14%−1.35%
1 week−3.59%−4.57%−2.09%
1 month−1.86%−15.81%−4.70%
3 months3.60%−14.73%−1.44%
6 months11.72%−20.90%2.69%
YTD20.82%0.98%20.04%
1 year35.82%−0.96%28.83%
3 years200.56%—156.52%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EDU vs URA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EDU (İş Portföy Tev Eğitime Destek Değişken Fon) and URA (Ata Portföy Enerji Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EDU leads in 8 and URA leads in 2. EDU is a Variable Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; URA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EDU leads (−2.46% vs −3.14%). 1 week: EDU leads (−3.59% vs −4.57%). 1 month: EDU leads (−1.86% vs −15.81%). 3 months: EDU leads (3.60% vs −14.73%). 6 months: EDU leads (11.72% vs −20.90%). YTD: EDU leads (20.82% vs 0.98%). 1 year: EDU leads (35.82% vs −0.96%). Size (TRY): URA leads (392.9M vs 368.1M). Investors: URA leads (6,673 vs 665). Risk: EDU leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EDU returned 20.82% and URA returned 0.98%; over the last year EDU returned 35.82% and URA returned −0.96%. Over the last month EDU returned −1.86% and URA returned −15.81%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, EDU has a size of TRY 368.1M with 665 investors, while URA has a size of TRY 392.9M with 6,673 investors. URA leads in size and URA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EDU is 3 out of 7 and that of URA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.