NZH vs URA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NZH (Neo Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and URA (Ata Portföy Enerji Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | NZH | URA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −2.29% | — | −2.06% |
| Daily | −1.82% | −1.03% | −0.41% |
| 1 week | −2.78% | −2.96% | −1.69% |
| 1 month | −5.83% | −11.65% | −3.34% |
| 3 months | −5.84% | −10.21% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 0.77% | −18.34% | 4.10% |
| YTD | 16.92% | 4.25% | 21.58% |
| 1 year | 30.13% | −0.31% | 30.90% |
| 3 years | 77.55% | — | 160.42% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the NZH vs URA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of NZH (Neo Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) and URA (Ata Portföy Enerji Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, NZH leads in 6 and URA leads in 3. NZH is a Variable Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; URA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: URA leads (−1.03% vs −1.82%). 1 week: NZH leads (−2.78% vs −2.96%). 1 month: NZH leads (−5.83% vs −11.65%). 3 months: NZH leads (−5.84% vs −10.21%). 6 months: NZH leads (0.77% vs −18.34%). YTD: NZH leads (16.92% vs 4.25%). 1 year: NZH leads (30.13% vs −0.31%). Size (TRY): URA leads (406.6M vs 392.7M). Investors: URA leads (6,718 vs 219).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, NZH or URA?
Year to date NZH returned 16.92% and URA returned 4.25%; over the last year NZH returned 30.13% and URA returned −0.31%. Over the last month NZH returned −5.83% and URA returned −11.65%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, NZH or URA?
As of October 22, 2026, NZH has a size of TRY 392.7M with 219 investors, while URA has a size of TRY 406.6M with 6,718 investors. URA leads in size and URA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of NZH and URA mean?
The CMB risk score of NZH is 6 out of 7 and that of URA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.