Yatırımcı.AI

EDT vs ONN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and ONN (Aktif Portföy Aktif Oniks Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

EDTONN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EDT vs ONN Fund Comparison
MetricEDTONNCategory median
Daily0.10%0.07%0.01%
1 week0.67%0.53%0.30%
1 month2.92%2.64%0.00%
3 months9.64%9.84%3.96%
6 months20.99%19.56%8.18%
YTD35.24%34.11%15.73%
1 year45.10%44.15%20.69%
3 years—249.46%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EDT vs ONN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EDT (Deniz Portföy Ted Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and ONN (Aktif Portföy Aktif Oniks Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, EDT leads in 8 and ONN leads in 2. EDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ONN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EDT leads (0.10% vs 0.07%). 1 week: EDT leads (0.67% vs 0.53%). 1 month: EDT leads (2.92% vs 2.64%). 3 months: ONN leads (9.84% vs 9.64%). 6 months: EDT leads (20.99% vs 19.56%). YTD: EDT leads (35.24% vs 34.11%). 1 year: EDT leads (45.10% vs 44.15%). Size (TRY): ONN leads (985M vs 951.5M). Investors: EDT leads (542 vs 467). Risk: EDT leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EDT returned 35.24% and ONN returned 34.11%; over the last year EDT returned 45.10% and ONN returned 44.15%. Over the last month EDT returned 2.92% and ONN returned 2.64%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, EDT has a size of TRY 951.5M with 542 investors, while ONN has a size of TRY 985M with 467 investors. ONN leads in size and EDT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EDT is 2 out of 7 and that of ONN is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.