EDP vs PSL Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EDP (Neo Portföy Koruncuk Eğitime Destek Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and PSL (Azimut Portföy 8.0 Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | EDP | PSL | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.28% | 0.05% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.65% | 0.35% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 3.16% | 2.12% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 10.44% | 7.26% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | — | 14.33% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 21.39% | 21.00% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | — | 29.45% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 134.65% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the EDP vs PSL comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EDP (Neo Portföy Koruncuk Eğitime Destek Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and PSL (Azimut Portföy 8.0 Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, EDP leads in 7 and PSL leads in 1. EDP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PSL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EDP leads (0.28% vs 0.05%). 1 week: EDP leads (0.65% vs 0.35%). 1 month: EDP leads (3.16% vs 2.12%). 3 months: EDP leads (10.44% vs 7.26%). YTD: EDP leads (21.39% vs 21.00%). Size (TRY): PSL leads (204.7M vs 200.1M). Investors: EDP leads (71 vs 44). Risk: EDP leads (2 vs 5).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, EDP or PSL?
Year to date EDP returned 21.39% and PSL returned 21.00%; over the last year EDP returned — and PSL returned 29.45%. Over the last month EDP returned 3.16% and PSL returned 2.12%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EDP or PSL?
As of September 28, 2026, EDP has a size of TRY 200.1M with 71 investors, while PSL has a size of TRY 204.7M with 44 investors. PSL leads in size and EDP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EDP and PSL mean?
The CMB risk score of EDP is 2 out of 7 and that of PSL is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.