Yatırımcı.AI

EDP vs YZK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EDP (Neo Portföy Koruncuk Eğitime Destek Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and YZK (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kalamış Serbest Fon) side by side.

EDPYZK
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

EDP vs YZK Fund Comparison
MetricEDPYZKCategory median
Daily0.28%−0.26%0.19%
1 week0.65%−0.31%0.42%
1 month3.16%−0.63%0.94%
3 months10.44%2.89%5.89%
6 months—10.06%12.86%
YTD21.39%11.18%18.07%
1 year—20.24%24.44%
3 years—121.64%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the EDP vs YZK comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EDP (Neo Portföy Koruncuk Eğitime Destek Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and YZK (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kalamış Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, EDP leads in 7 and YZK leads in 1. EDP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YZK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EDP leads (0.28% vs −0.26%). 1 week: EDP leads (0.65% vs −0.31%). 1 month: EDP leads (3.16% vs −0.63%). 3 months: EDP leads (10.44% vs 2.89%). YTD: EDP leads (21.39% vs 11.18%). Size (TRY): EDP leads (200.1M vs 193M). Investors: YZK leads (177 vs 71). Risk: EDP leads (2 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date EDP returned 21.39% and YZK returned 11.18%; over the last year EDP returned — and YZK returned 20.24%. Over the last month EDP returned 3.16% and YZK returned −0.63%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, EDP has a size of TRY 200.1M with 71 investors, while YZK has a size of TRY 193M with 177 investors. EDP leads in size and YZK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EDP is 2 out of 7 and that of YZK is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.