Yatırımcı.AI

PSL vs RSK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PSL (Azimut Portföy 8.0 Serbest Fon) and RSK (Rota Portföy Onsekizinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

PSLRSK
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

PSL vs RSK Fund Comparison
MetricPSLRSKCategory median
Daily0.05%1.33%0.19%
1 week0.35%3.93%0.42%
1 month2.12%−2.87%0.94%
3 months7.26%4.51%5.89%
6 months14.33%24.80%12.86%
YTD21.00%33.94%18.07%
1 year29.45%76.49%24.44%
3 years134.65%—111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the PSL vs RSK comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PSL (Azimut Portföy 8.0 Serbest Fon) and RSK (Rota Portföy Onsekizinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, PSL leads in 2 and RSK leads in 7. PSL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Azimut Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RSK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RSK leads (1.33% vs 0.05%). 1 week: RSK leads (3.93% vs 0.35%). 1 month: PSL leads (2.12% vs −2.87%). 3 months: PSL leads (7.26% vs 4.51%). 6 months: RSK leads (24.80% vs 14.33%). YTD: RSK leads (33.94% vs 21.00%). 1 year: RSK leads (76.49% vs 29.45%). Size (TRY): RSK leads (208.6M vs 204.7M). Investors: RSK leads (132 vs 44).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date PSL returned 21.00% and RSK returned 33.94%; over the last year PSL returned 29.45% and RSK returned 76.49%. Over the last month PSL returned 2.12% and RSK returned −2.87%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, PSL has a size of TRY 204.7M with 44 investors, while RSK has a size of TRY 208.6M with 132 investors. RSK leads in size and RSK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PSL is 5 out of 7 and that of RSK is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.