Yatırımcı.AI

ECA vs EIB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ECA (Global Md Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and EIB (Astra Portföy Değişken Fon) side by side.

ECAEIB
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

ECA vs EIB Fund Comparison
MetricECAEIBCategory median
Today (est.)−2.36%—−1.84%
Daily0.66%0.37%0.32%
1 week1.21%−1.00%0.42%
1 month−0.16%0.32%−1.48%
3 months9.73%7.04%4.48%
6 months31.49%22.64%14.82%
YTD51.56%31.60%25.33%
1 year67.43%43.81%35.72%
3 years187.23%232.97%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 12:05.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the ECA vs EIB comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ECA (Global Md Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and EIB (Astra Portföy Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ECA leads in 8 and EIB leads in 3. ECA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Global Md Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; EIB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Qınvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ECA leads (0.66% vs 0.37%). 1 week: ECA leads (1.21% vs −1.00%). 1 month: EIB leads (0.32% vs −0.16%). 3 months: ECA leads (9.73% vs 7.04%). 6 months: ECA leads (31.49% vs 22.64%). YTD: ECA leads (51.56% vs 31.60%). 1 year: ECA leads (67.43% vs 43.81%). 3 years: EIB leads (232.97% vs 187.23%). Size (TRY): ECA leads (300.2M vs 299.4M). Investors: ECA leads (824 vs 432). Risk: EIB leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date ECA returned 51.56% and EIB returned 31.60%; over the last year ECA returned 67.43% and EIB returned 43.81%. Over the last month ECA returned −0.16% and EIB returned 0.32%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, ECA has a size of TRY 300.2M with 824 investors, while EIB has a size of TRY 299.4M with 432 investors. ECA leads in size and ECA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ECA is 6 out of 7 and that of EIB is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.