Yatırımcı.AI

EIB vs RIK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EIB (Astra Portföy Değişken Fon) and RIK (Re-Pıe Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) side by side.

EIBRIK
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

EIB vs RIK Fund Comparison
MetricEIBRIKCategory median
Daily0.37%0.98%0.32%
1 week−1.00%−5.05%0.42%
1 month0.32%−8.38%−1.48%
3 months7.04%−10.79%4.48%
6 months22.64%−0.19%14.82%
YTD31.60%6.09%25.33%
1 year43.81%21.03%35.72%
3 years232.97%207.11%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the EIB vs RIK comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EIB (Astra Portföy Değişken Fon) and RIK (Re-Pıe Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, EIB leads in 8 and RIK leads in 3. EIB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Qınvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RIK is a Variable Fund fund managed by Re-Pıe Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RIK leads (0.98% vs 0.37%). 1 week: EIB leads (−1.00% vs −5.05%). 1 month: EIB leads (0.32% vs −8.38%). 3 months: EIB leads (7.04% vs −10.79%). 6 months: EIB leads (22.64% vs −0.19%). YTD: EIB leads (31.60% vs 6.09%). 1 year: EIB leads (43.81% vs 21.03%). 3 years: EIB leads (232.97% vs 207.11%). Size (TRY): RIK leads (301.6M vs 299.4M). Investors: RIK leads (2,589 vs 432). Risk: EIB leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date EIB returned 31.60% and RIK returned 6.09%; over the last year EIB returned 43.81% and RIK returned 21.03%. Over the last month EIB returned 0.32% and RIK returned −8.38%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, EIB has a size of TRY 299.4M with 432 investors, while RIK has a size of TRY 301.6M with 2,589 investors. RIK leads in size and RIK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EIB is 3 out of 7 and that of RIK is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.