EBI vs ZVO Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EBI (Emaa Blue Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and ZVO (Ziraat Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | EBI | ZVO | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.12% | 0.90% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −0.51% | −0.01% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −1.42% | 5.50% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 4.46% | 6.76% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 10.75% | 11.01% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 11.16% | −10.18% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | — | −15.47% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 62.48% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the EBI vs ZVO comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of EBI (Emaa Blue Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) and ZVO (Ziraat Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EBI leads in 2 and ZVO leads in 7. EBI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZVO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ZVO leads (0.90% vs 0.12%). 1 week: ZVO leads (−0.01% vs −0.51%). 1 month: ZVO leads (5.50% vs −1.42%). 3 months: ZVO leads (6.76% vs 4.46%). 6 months: ZVO leads (11.01% vs 10.75%). YTD: EBI leads (11.16% vs −10.18%). Size (TRY): ZVO leads (835.7M vs 809.2M). Investors: ZVO leads (308 vs 14). Risk: EBI leads (0 vs 7).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, EBI or ZVO?
Year to date EBI returned 11.16% and ZVO returned −10.18%; over the last year EBI returned — and ZVO returned −15.47%. Over the last month EBI returned −1.42% and ZVO returned 5.50%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, EBI or ZVO?
As of September 28, 2026, EBI has a size of TRY 809.2M with 14 investors, while ZVO has a size of TRY 835.7M with 308 investors. ZVO leads in size and ZVO leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of EBI and ZVO mean?
The CMB risk score of EBI is 0 out of 7 and that of ZVO is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.