NMU vs ZVO Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NMU (Nurol Portföy Mutlak Getiri Hedefli Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) and ZVO (Ziraat Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | NMU | ZVO | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.13% | 0.90% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 0.70% | −0.01% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 2.61% | 5.50% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 9.64% | 6.76% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 21.31% | 11.01% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 29.52% | −10.18% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | — | −15.47% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | — | 62.48% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the NMU vs ZVO comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of NMU (Nurol Portföy Mutlak Getiri Hedefli Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon) and ZVO (Ziraat Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, NMU leads in 6 and ZVO leads in 3. NMU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZVO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ZVO leads (0.90% vs 0.13%). 1 week: NMU leads (0.70% vs −0.01%). 1 month: ZVO leads (5.50% vs 2.61%). 3 months: NMU leads (9.64% vs 6.76%). 6 months: NMU leads (21.31% vs 11.01%). YTD: NMU leads (29.52% vs −10.18%). Size (TRY): NMU leads (848.5M vs 835.7M). Investors: ZVO leads (308 vs 259). Risk: NMU leads (2 vs 7).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, NMU or ZVO?
Year to date NMU returned 29.52% and ZVO returned −10.18%; over the last year NMU returned — and ZVO returned −15.47%. Over the last month NMU returned 2.61% and ZVO returned 5.50%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, NMU or ZVO?
As of September 28, 2026, NMU has a size of TRY 848.5M with 259 investors, while ZVO has a size of TRY 835.7M with 308 investors. NMU leads in size and ZVO leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of NMU and ZVO mean?
The CMB risk score of NMU is 2 out of 7 and that of ZVO is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.