Yatırımcı.AI

DVS vs KTT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and KTT (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dördüncü Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

DVSKTT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DVS vs KTT Fund Comparison
MetricDVSKTTCategory median
Daily0.10%0.07%0.01%
1 week0.69%0.34%0.30%
1 month2.99%1.63%0.00%
3 months9.88%5.33%3.96%
6 months20.86%11.18%8.18%
YTD35.28%17.39%15.73%
1 year45.63%21.66%20.69%
3 years—116.69%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DVS vs KTT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and KTT (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Dördüncü Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, DVS leads in 8 and KTT leads in 1. DVS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KTT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DVS leads (0.10% vs 0.07%). 1 week: DVS leads (0.69% vs 0.34%). 1 month: DVS leads (2.99% vs 1.63%). 3 months: DVS leads (9.88% vs 5.33%). 6 months: DVS leads (20.86% vs 11.18%). YTD: DVS leads (35.28% vs 17.39%). 1 year: DVS leads (45.63% vs 21.66%). Size (TRY): DVS leads (5.3B vs 4.6B). Investors: KTT leads (1,274 vs 367).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DVS returned 35.28% and KTT returned 17.39%; over the last year DVS returned 45.63% and KTT returned 21.66%. Over the last month DVS returned 2.99% and KTT returned 1.63%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, DVS has a size of TRY 5.3B with 367 investors, while KTT has a size of TRY 4.6B with 1,274 investors. DVS leads in size and KTT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DVS is 2 out of 7 and that of KTT is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.