DVS vs HTS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and HTS (HSBC Portföy Altıncı Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DVS | HTS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | −1.86% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.69% | −1.61% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 2.99% | −2.40% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 9.88% | 4.44% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 20.86% | 17.51% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 35.28% | 25.46% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 45.63% | 31.93% | 20.69% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DVS vs HTS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DVS (Deniz Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and HTS (HSBC Portföy Altıncı Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, DVS leads in 8 and HTS leads in 1. DVS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; HTS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by HSBC Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: DVS leads (0.10% vs −1.86%). 1 week: DVS leads (0.69% vs −1.61%). 1 month: DVS leads (2.99% vs −2.40%). 3 months: DVS leads (9.88% vs 4.44%). 6 months: DVS leads (20.86% vs 17.51%). YTD: DVS leads (35.28% vs 25.46%). 1 year: DVS leads (45.63% vs 31.93%). Size (TRY): DVS leads (5.3B vs 4.8B). Investors: HTS leads (2,587 vs 367).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DVS or HTS?
Year to date DVS returned 35.28% and HTS returned 25.46%; over the last year DVS returned 45.63% and HTS returned 31.93%. Over the last month DVS returned 2.99% and HTS returned −2.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DVS or HTS?
As of October 23, 2026, DVS has a size of TRY 5.3B with 367 investors, while HTS has a size of TRY 4.8B with 2,587 investors. DVS leads in size and HTS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DVS and HTS mean?
The CMB risk score of DVS is 2 out of 7 and that of HTS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.