Yatırımcı.AI

DUV vs MEB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DUV (Deniz Portföy Uzun Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) and MEB (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

DUVMEB
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

DUV vs MEB Fund Comparison
MetricDUVMEBCategory median
Daily0.13%0.22%0.24%
1 week0.07%0.47%0.61%
1 month0.15%1.60%1.60%
3 months3.89%7.97%7.35%
6 months14.58%20.88%18.12%
YTD7.59%19.88%20.27%
1 year22.99%—35.25%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the DUV vs MEB comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DUV (Deniz Portföy Uzun Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) and MEB (Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, DUV leads in 0 and MEB leads in 9. DUV is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; MEB is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Metlife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MEB leads (0.22% vs 0.13%). 1 week: MEB leads (0.47% vs 0.07%). 1 month: MEB leads (1.60% vs 0.15%). 3 months: MEB leads (7.97% vs 3.89%). 6 months: MEB leads (20.88% vs 14.58%). YTD: MEB leads (19.88% vs 7.59%). Size (TRY): MEB leads (72.3M vs 55.6M). Investors: MEB leads (4,226 vs 189). Risk: MEB leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date DUV returned 7.59% and MEB returned 19.88%; over the last year DUV returned 22.99% and MEB returned —. Over the last month DUV returned 0.15% and MEB returned 1.60%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, DUV has a size of TRY 55.6M with 189 investors, while MEB has a size of TRY 72.3M with 4,226 investors. MEB leads in size and MEB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DUV is 5 out of 7 and that of MEB is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.