Yatırımcı.AI

DUV vs MBR Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DUV (Deniz Portföy Uzun Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) and MBR (MT Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.

DUVMBR
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DUV vs MBR Fund Comparison
MetricDUVMBRCategory median
Daily0.31%0.23%0.27%
1 week0.58%0.47%0.60%
1 month2.50%−2.70%2.84%
3 months7.91%2.96%9.11%
6 months14.25%17.13%18.32%
YTD10.96%37.10%26.14%
1 year23.02%45.44%37.81%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DUV vs MBR Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DUV (Deniz Portföy Uzun Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) and MBR (MT Portföy Birinci Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DUV leads in 5 and MBR leads in 5. DUV is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MBR is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by MT Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DUV leads (0.31% vs 0.23%). 1 week: DUV leads (0.58% vs 0.47%). 1 month: DUV leads (2.50% vs −2.70%). 3 months: DUV leads (7.91% vs 2.96%). 6 months: MBR leads (17.13% vs 14.25%). YTD: MBR leads (37.10% vs 10.96%). 1 year: MBR leads (45.44% vs 23.02%). Size (TRY): MBR leads (67M vs 53.8M). Investors: DUV leads (172 vs 170). Risk: MBR leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DUV returned 10.96% and MBR returned 37.10%; over the last year DUV returned 23.02% and MBR returned 45.44%. Over the last month DUV returned 2.50% and MBR returned −2.70%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, DUV has a size of TRY 53.8M with 172 investors, while MBR has a size of TRY 67M with 170 investors. MBR leads in size and DUV leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DUV is 5 out of 7 and that of MBR is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.