DUD vs RLH Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DUD (Deniz Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RLH (Rota Portföy Yirminci Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DUD | RLH | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | 0.14% | −0.35% |
| Daily | 0.09% | 0.03% | 0.08% |
| 1 week | 1.69% | 0.97% | 0.69% |
| 1 month | 4.61% | 2.29% | 2.03% |
| 3 months | 3.71% | 8.02% | 3.24% |
| 6 months | 10.95% | 15.51% | 8.32% |
| YTD | 17.23% | 42.52% | 17.50% |
| 1 year | 22.56% | 45.58% | 21.40% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DUD vs RLH Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DUD (Deniz Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RLH (Rota Portföy Yirminci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 11, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DUD leads in 4 and RLH leads in 6. DUD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RLH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: DUD leads (0.09% vs 0.03%). 1 week: DUD leads (1.69% vs 0.97%). 1 month: DUD leads (4.61% vs 2.29%). 3 months: RLH leads (8.02% vs 3.71%). 6 months: RLH leads (15.51% vs 10.95%). YTD: RLH leads (42.52% vs 17.23%). 1 year: RLH leads (45.58% vs 22.56%). Size (TRY): RLH leads (255.6M vs 255M). Investors: DUD leads (217 vs 31). Risk: RLH leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DUD or RLH?
Year to date DUD returned 17.23% and RLH returned 42.52%; over the last year DUD returned 22.56% and RLH returned 45.58%. Over the last month DUD returned 4.61% and RLH returned 2.29%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DUD or RLH?
As of November 11, 2026, DUD has a size of TRY 255M with 217 investors, while RLH has a size of TRY 255.6M with 31 investors. RLH leads in size and DUD leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DUD and RLH mean?
The CMB risk score of DUD is 6 out of 7 and that of RLH is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.