DRA vs JUP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DRA (Neo Portföy Dora Serbest Fon) and JUP (Aura Portföy Jüpiter Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DRA | JUP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | 0.59% | — | 0.95% |
| Daily | −1.78% | −0.01% | 0.06% |
| 1 week | 4.95% | −0.61% | 0.56% |
| 1 month | 2.79% | 1.23% | 1.84% |
| 3 months | −1.43% | 3.30% | 3.29% |
| 6 months | 4.46% | 8.80% | 7.90% |
| YTD | 3.38% | 14.00% | 17.53% |
| 1 year | 20.92% | 10.87% | 21.48% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DRA vs JUP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DRA (Neo Portföy Dora Serbest Fon) and JUP (Aura Portföy Jüpiter Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DRA leads in 5 and JUP leads in 5. DRA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; JUP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aura Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: JUP leads (−0.01% vs −1.78%). 1 week: DRA leads (4.95% vs −0.61%). 1 month: DRA leads (2.79% vs 1.23%). 3 months: JUP leads (3.30% vs −1.43%). 6 months: JUP leads (8.80% vs 4.46%). YTD: JUP leads (14.00% vs 3.38%). 1 year: DRA leads (20.92% vs 10.87%). Size (TRY): DRA leads (39.9M vs 35.9M). Investors: DRA leads (35 vs 34). Risk: JUP leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DRA or JUP?
Year to date DRA returned 3.38% and JUP returned 14.00%; over the last year DRA returned 20.92% and JUP returned 10.87%. Over the last month DRA returned 2.79% and JUP returned 1.23%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DRA or JUP?
As of November 12, 2026, DRA has a size of TRY 39.9M with 35 investors, while JUP has a size of TRY 35.9M with 34 investors. DRA leads in size and DRA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DRA and JUP mean?
The CMB risk score of DRA is 7 out of 7 and that of JUP is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.