Yatırımcı.AI

DNM vs DNP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DNM (QNB Portföy Dinamik Dağılımlı Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and DNP (Deniz Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

DNMDNP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DNM vs DNP Fund Comparison
MetricDNMDNPCategory median
Daily0.21%0.07%0.05%
1 week0.07%0.69%0.44%
1 month0.40%2.95%0.38%
3 months6.05%9.83%3.95%
6 months11.27%20.94%8.45%
YTD14.43%35.58%16.06%
1 year22.47%45.86%20.98%
3 years20.45%—107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DNM vs DNP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DNM (QNB Portföy Dinamik Dağılımlı Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and DNP (Deniz Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, DNM leads in 3 and DNP leads in 6. DNM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; DNP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DNM leads (0.21% vs 0.07%). 1 week: DNP leads (0.69% vs 0.07%). 1 month: DNP leads (2.95% vs 0.40%). 3 months: DNP leads (9.83% vs 6.05%). 6 months: DNP leads (20.94% vs 11.27%). YTD: DNP leads (35.58% vs 14.43%). 1 year: DNP leads (45.86% vs 22.47%). Size (TRY): DNM leads (1.3B vs 903.1M). Investors: DNM leads (933 vs 383).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DNM returned 14.43% and DNP returned 35.58%; over the last year DNM returned 22.47% and DNP returned 45.86%. Over the last month DNM returned 0.40% and DNP returned 2.95%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, DNM has a size of TRY 1.3B with 933 investors, while DNP has a size of TRY 903.1M with 383 investors. DNM leads in size and DNM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DNM is — out of 7 and that of DNP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.