ARM vs KGM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ARM (Ak Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and KGM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Gümüş Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | ARM | KGM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.41% | 0.80% | 0.36% |
| 1 week | 1.01% | −3.30% | 0.23% |
| 1 month | 0.32% | −4.91% | −1.05% |
| 3 months | 3.60% | 13.54% | 6.35% |
| 6 months | 9.69% | 1.02% | 13.81% |
| YTD | 19.07% | −1.19% | 22.40% |
| 1 year | 28.88% | 60.17% | 35.81% |
| 3 years | 179.55% | — | 175.03% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the ARM vs KGM comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ARM (Ak Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and KGM (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Gümüş Katılım Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ARM leads in 6 and KGM leads in 4. ARM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KGM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KGM leads (0.80% vs 0.41%). 1 week: ARM leads (1.01% vs −3.30%). 1 month: ARM leads (0.32% vs −4.91%). 3 months: KGM leads (13.54% vs 3.60%). 6 months: ARM leads (9.69% vs 1.02%). YTD: ARM leads (19.07% vs −1.19%). 1 year: KGM leads (60.17% vs 28.88%). Size (TRY): ARM leads (2.9B vs 2.8B). Investors: KGM leads (29,413 vs 4,863). Risk: ARM leads (0 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, ARM or KGM?
Year to date ARM returned 19.07% and KGM returned −1.19%; over the last year ARM returned 28.88% and KGM returned 60.17%. Over the last month ARM returned 0.32% and KGM returned −4.91%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ARM or KGM?
As of September 28, 2026, ARM has a size of TRY 2.9B with 4,863 investors, while KGM has a size of TRY 2.8B with 29,413 investors. ARM leads in size and KGM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ARM and KGM mean?
The CMB risk score of ARM is 0 out of 7 and that of KGM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.