Yatırımcı.AI

DL2 vs RPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DL2 (Deniz Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and RPP (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

DL2RPP
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

DL2 vs RPP Fund Comparison
MetricDL2RPPCategory median
Daily0.29%0.29%0.29%
1 week0.71%0.69%0.70%
1 month3.02%3.09%3.12%
3 months9.91%9.93%9.98%
6 months21.35%21.68%21.60%
YTD31.97%32.55%32.28%
1 year46.28%46.60%46.56%
3 years32.55%264.24%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the DL2 vs RPP comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DL2 (Deniz Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and RPP (Rota Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, DL2 leads in 3 and RPP leads in 8. DL2 is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; RPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RPP leads (0.29% vs 0.29%). 1 week: DL2 leads (0.71% vs 0.69%). 1 month: RPP leads (3.09% vs 3.02%). 3 months: RPP leads (9.93% vs 9.91%). 6 months: RPP leads (21.68% vs 21.35%). YTD: RPP leads (32.55% vs 31.97%). 1 year: RPP leads (46.60% vs 46.28%). 3 years: RPP leads (264.24% vs 32.55%). Size (TRY): DL2 leads (6.7B vs 4.9B). Investors: RPP leads (6,022 vs 615). Risk: DL2 leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date DL2 returned 31.97% and RPP returned 32.55%; over the last year DL2 returned 46.28% and RPP returned 46.60%. Over the last month DL2 returned 3.02% and RPP returned 3.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, DL2 has a size of TRY 6.7B with 615 investors, while RPP has a size of TRY 4.9B with 6,022 investors. DL2 leads in size and RPP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DL2 is 1 out of 7 and that of RPP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.