Yatırımcı.AI

CKL vs GPG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CKL (Yapı Kredi Portföy Çoklu Varlık Değişken Fon) and GPG (Inveo Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) side by side.

CKLGPG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CKL vs GPG Fund Comparison
MetricCKLGPGCategory median
Daily−1.43%−0.57%−0.83%
1 week−2.43%−1.47%−0.98%
1 month0.39%−7.23%−1.82%
3 months14.66%−0.45%3.78%
6 months27.54%24.06%14.04%
YTD38.31%29.71%24.40%
1 year50.07%34.89%34.17%
3 years—184.13%157.59%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CKL vs GPG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CKL (Yapı Kredi Portföy Çoklu Varlık Değişken Fon) and GPG (Inveo Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CKL leads in 6 and GPG leads in 4. CKL is a Variable Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GPG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPG leads (−0.57% vs −1.43%). 1 week: GPG leads (−1.47% vs −2.43%). 1 month: CKL leads (0.39% vs −7.23%). 3 months: CKL leads (14.66% vs −0.45%). 6 months: CKL leads (27.54% vs 24.06%). YTD: CKL leads (38.31% vs 29.71%). 1 year: CKL leads (50.07% vs 34.89%). Size (TRY): GPG leads (936.3M vs 915.9M). Investors: GPG leads (2,517 vs 1,333). Risk: CKL leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CKL returned 38.31% and GPG returned 29.71%; over the last year CKL returned 50.07% and GPG returned 34.89%. Over the last month CKL returned 0.39% and GPG returned −7.23%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, CKL has a size of TRY 915.9M with 1,333 investors, while GPG has a size of TRY 936.3M with 2,517 investors. GPG leads in size and GPG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CKL is 5 out of 7 and that of GPG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.