Yatırımcı.AI

GZZ vs RPM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZZ (Garanti Portföy Finansal Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) and RPM (Rota Portföy İlaç ve Medikal Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

GZZRPM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GZZ vs RPM Fund Comparison
MetricGZZRPMCategory median
Daily−0.81%−0.16%−1.31%
1 week0.60%−0.09%−2.04%
1 month−4.82%−5.38%−4.70%
3 months−1.31%−0.09%−1.44%
6 months−0.23%6.57%2.69%
YTD2.90%23.14%20.08%
1 year13.42%31.82%28.83%
3 years154.28%140.03%156.57%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GZZ vs RPM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZZ (Garanti Portföy Finansal Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) and RPM (Rota Portföy İlaç ve Medikal Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GZZ leads in 5 and RPM leads in 6. GZZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RPM leads (−0.16% vs −0.81%). 1 week: GZZ leads (0.60% vs −0.09%). 1 month: GZZ leads (−4.82% vs −5.38%). 3 months: RPM leads (−0.09% vs −1.31%). 6 months: RPM leads (6.57% vs −0.23%). YTD: RPM leads (23.14% vs 2.90%). 1 year: RPM leads (31.82% vs 13.42%). 3 years: GZZ leads (154.28% vs 140.03%). Size (TRY): GZZ leads (54.4M vs 54.1M). Investors: RPM leads (2,223 vs 1,113). Risk: GZZ leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GZZ returned 2.90% and RPM returned 23.14%; over the last year GZZ returned 13.42% and RPM returned 31.82%. Over the last month GZZ returned −4.82% and RPM returned −5.38%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, GZZ has a size of TRY 54.4M with 1,113 investors, while RPM has a size of TRY 54.1M with 2,223 investors. GZZ leads in size and RPM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZZ is 5 out of 7 and that of RPM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.